Chapter 8
Teaching & Learning
Goals
The University of Michigan provides rich academic and social settings to help students find the right combination of courses and extra-curricular activities to meet their individual needs. It also seeks to enhance the student learning experience by improving the student-faculty ratio, encouraging international experiences, supporting academic multicultural initiatives, keeping pace with instructional technology and facilities, and expanding undergraduate engaged learning opportunities.
Overview
Instruction of students is a shared activity involving tenured and tenure-track faculty, lecturers, clinical faculty, other instructional faculty, and graduate student instructors. Faculty incorporate current research and scholarly work into their courses and enrich the classroom experience with exceptional expertise and depth.
The university continuously develops its educational environment to equip students with essential knowledge and competencies for today’s world. The Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT) and Center for Academic Innovation (CAI) partner with faculty, graduate students, postdocs, and administrators to support and promote the advancement of evidence-based learning and teaching practices, curricular innovation, tools for student success and equity, and educational research and analytics.
The institution supports the development of traditional capabilities – the ability to speak and write clearly, reason critically and quantitatively, gain competence in a student’s discipline of choice, and engage with the arts and humanities – and prepares students for the future by helping to build confidence to innovate and take risks, develop skills for group work, collaborate effectively with individuals from diverse backgrounds and cultures, and have command of the latest information technologies.
The university offers undergraduate students the opportunity to participate in focused “learning communities,” each organized around intellectual interests, such as international issues, research, or civic engagement. These give students the opportunity to live, interact and learn with a close-knit group that includes faculty and staff.
Global engagement is an area of special emphasis as a focus of unique learning opportunities. The Global Michigan web portal helps students find and pursue the kind of deep, cultural understanding that comes through shared experiences among students and faculty from different countries and cultures.
The university regularly administers a survey of undergraduate students known as UMAY (University of Michigan Asks You). UMAY asks students to report about their satisfaction with academic programs, their sense of knowledge gain, and their opportunities to gain experience outside of the classroom. Data from past surveys are summarized in this chapter.
Instructional Workforce
Course instruction is performed by individuals in a variety of job categories including tenured and tenure-track faculty members, lecturers, clinical instructional faculty, and graduate student instructors.
,Graduate Student Instructor,Other Instructional Faculty,Clinical Instructional Faculty,Lecturer,Tenure-Track Faculty,Tenured Faculty Headcount,1998,409,2743,1248,693,2536 FTE,979,424,2354,1093,669,2213
SOURCE: U-M Human Resources Data
Headcount represents the total number of faculty members, regardless of full-time status. Full-time equivalent (FTE) faculty represents the total teaching or research load of faculty members, expressed as a proportion of a full-time workload. A standard full-time faculty load is one FTE, while part-time faculty loads are expressed as one-third FTE.
“Other Instructional Faculty” includes regular faculty not assigned to the tenure track, supplemental instructional faculty, and adjunct lecturers.
Student-Faculty Ratio
U-M’s undergraduate students-to-faculty ratio was lower than the averages of AAU public and Big Ten institutions in Fall 2024.
,Student-Faculty Ratio,Student-Faculty Ratio,Student-Faculty Ratio,Student-Faculty Ratio, Georgia Tech,22,,,, Washington,20,,,, Illinois,20,,,, UCLA,19,,,, UC-Berkeley,19,,,, Texas-Austin,19,,,, Wisconsin,18,,,, AAU Publics (avg.),,,,18, Big Ten (avg.),,,16,, Ohio State,16,,,, MICHIGAN,,15,,, UNC-Chapel Hill,15,,,, Virginia,14,,,, Cornell,9,,,, Emory,9,,,, USC,9,,,, Penn,8,,,, AAU Privates (avg.),,,,,8 Harvard,7,,,, Washington-St. Louis,7,,,, Northwestern,6,,,, Stanford,6,,,, Carnegie Mellon,6,,,, Columbia,6,,,, Johns Hopkins,6,,,, Yale,6,,,, Duke,5,,,, Princeton,5,,,, Chicago,5,,,, MIT,3,,,,
SOURCE: U.S. News & World Report Best Colleges, 2025 Edition
All the universities in the chart are AAU member institutions. (See Appendix A for a complete AAU member list.) The AAU public and private institution averages and the Big Ten institution averages are based on all respective member institutions, not only those in the chart.
Center for Research on Learning and Teaching
U-M is committed to promoting excellence, equity, and innovation in teaching. The Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT) plays a central role in supporting these efforts on campus.
,Students receiving midterm student feedback (MSF) sessions,"Participants in customized programs for departments, schools, & colleges",Consultations,Participants in campuswide programs,Instructors receiving midterm student feedback (MSF) sessions 2017-18,8744,4708,2142,7587,290 2018-19,14374,5039,3578,8099,397 2019-20,13668,4438,5281,5732,383 2020-21,7962,13962,8775,1031,225 2021-22,8243,8097,6364,1070,203 2022-23,8073,9785,8859,1258,202 2023-24,6947,10330,8817,1441,237 2024-25,8276,7231,9005,2940,236
SOURCE: Center for Research on Learning and Teaching Annual Reports
CRLT partners with U-M faculty, graduate student instructors (GSIs), and academic leaders to advance a university culture that values and rewards teaching, respects and supports individual differences among learners, and creates learning environments in which diverse students and instructors can excel.
Core services include early career orientations and teaching academies, 1:1 consultations, seminars and workshops, and grants to fund instructional innovations; customized programs and retreats for U-M’s departments, schools, and colleges, including assistance with curriculum redesign and GenAI; and a website that houses a rich array of resources on teaching and learning (www.crlt.umich.edu)
Specialized programs include a Canvas course, An Instructor’s Guide to Promoting Student Mental Health and Well-Being; the Foundational Course Initiative, which supports the redesign of large undergraduate courses with a focus on equity and student success; the CRLT Players, a theatre troupe that performs sketches on classroom and departmental climate; and CRLT in Engineering, a branch office that supports the educational mission of the College of Engineering.
Learning Communities
U-M students take advantage of many opportunities to join communities of common intellectual interest to enhance their educational experiences.
8.4 Student Participation in Michigan Learning Communities, 2023-24
| Program | First-years | Sophomores | Juniors | Seniors | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Studies Program: This program provides small enriched courses, academic advising and academic support and tutoring. | 639 | 742 | 695 | 838 | 2,914 |
| Global Scholars Program: Prepares students to be interculturally competent global citizens, champions for meaningful change, and innovative leaders of tomorrow. | – | 43 | 34 | 30 | 107 |
| LSA Honors Program | 389 | 507 | 531 | 518 | 1,945 |
| Engineering Honors Program | – | 60 | 91 | 96 | 268 |
| Nursing Honors Program | – | 12 | 9 | 11 | 32 |
| Pharmacy Honors Program | – | 2 | 8 | 6 | 16 |
| Health Sciences Scholars Program: For students seeking to explore the health sciences. | 118 | 24 | – | 6 | 148 |
| LEAPS*: Students in the Learning, Equity, and Problem Solving for the Public Good program in the Marsal Family School of Education live and learn on the Marygrove Campus in Detroit. | 25 | 2 | – | – | 27 |
| Living ArtsEngine: Brings together students in engineering, the arts, and other fields to explore creativity and innovation. | 84 | 15 | 4 | – | 103 |
| Lloyd Hall Scholars Program: For students to pursue creative expression through writing, the visual arts, and cultural and social involvement. | 70 | 37 | 15 | 14 | 136 |
| Max Kade German Residence: Students practice German every day while living in a dedicated house that offers unique cultural events and a trip to a German-speaking country. | 4 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 27 |
| Michigan Community Scholars Program: For students interested in community service, civic engagement, and social justice. | 86 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 112 |
| Michigan Research and Discovery Scholars: For students interested in a research partnership with a faculty member and a small, diverse, and supportive residential community. | 115 | 24 | 11 | 3 | 153 |
| Residential College: A four-year program with an emphasis on languages, writing, and the arts. Students live together in the RC residence hall their first two years. | 185 | 188 | 127 | 178 | 678 |
| Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program: Students participate in research, working with faculty from all academic fields. | 366 | 515 | 379 | 88 | 1,348 |
| Women in Science and Engineering Residence Program (WISE-RP): For students with interests in the sciences, technology, engineering, mathematics, and health fields. | 104 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 134 |
SOURCE: Program Offices. *LEAPS figures are for Fall 2024 program since that is the program’s first term.
Michigan Learning Communities are generally groups of students and faculty from diverse backgrounds, drawn together by shared goals and common intellectual interests. These programs combine the personal attention of a small college environment while still providing the resources of a large research university. In some communities, the members live in the same residence hall during the academic year.
More information about Michigan Learning Communities and Living Learning/Theme Communities can be found online.
Global Education
University of Michigan was named the country’s top-ranked public university when it comes to education abroad, and #2 in the nation overall.
,Student count 2014-15,4428 2015-16,4699 2016-17,5290 2017-18,5427 2018-19,5640 2019-20,2372 2020-21,480 2021-22,2906 2022-23,4922 2023-24,5462
SOURCE: Education Abroad Reports, Global Michigan
U-M was ranked #1 in the nation during International Education Week 2024, and #2 in the nation overall according to the annual Open Doors report issued by the Institute of International Education.
The phrase “education abroad” refers to students who received academic credit for educational programs they attended abroad, or participated in research, internship, volunteer service, work opportunities, and conferences and professional meetings abroad as not-for-credit activities. The counts in the chart encompass both undergraduate- and graduate-level programs.
Although the pandemic put a halt to campus-related travel for the last half of academic year 2019-20 and continued to affect travel through academic year 2022-23, U-M student participation in education abroad has returned to its impressive levels prior to the interruption.
U-M students traveled to 121 countries for international experiences during the 2023-24 academic year.
Country,Student Count ar,172 au,176 ca,378 dk,236 fr,356 de,278 ie,206 it,405 es,881 gb,414
SOURCE: Education Abroad Reports, Global Michigan
Numbers in parentheses indicate the number of students who visited that country at least once during the academic year. The level of all study and other educational travel abroad has been increasing since the pandemic has subsided.
Student Satisfaction
Seniors express high levels of satisfaction with the quality of instruction they have received, the availability of small classes and engagement with faculty members.
8.6 Self-Reported Satisfaction of Graduating Seniors with Instructional Quality and Faculty Interaction, 2009-2024
,Very dissatisfied,Dissatisfied,Somewhat dissatisfied,Somewhat satisfied,Satisfied,Very satisfied 2024,1,2,5,21,52,20 2022,1,2,5,20,50,23 2019,1,2,7,25,46,18 2017,1,2,6,21,48,22 2015,1,2,5,23,47,21
,Very dissatisfied,Dissatisfied,Somewhat dissatisfied,Somewhat satisfied,Satisfied,Very satisfied 2024,5,8,18,23,30,16 2022,3,8,14,25,31,19 2019,3,7,15,27,35,14 2017,3,7,13,25,36,17 2015,2,6,12,23,39,18
,Very dissatisfied,Dissatisfied,Somewhat dissatisfied,Somewhat satisfied,Satisfied,Very satisfied 2024,1,2,5,24,49,19 2022,0,2,6,24,48,20 2019,1,3,8,27,44,17 2017,1,3,8,25,44,19 2015,1,2,7,24,47,20
SOURCE: U-M Asks You (UMAY) undergraduate survey
The segments shaded in blue represent the fraction of students who replied “Very satisfied,” “Satisfied,” and “Somewhat satisfied” for the particular question and year.
Engaged Learning & Research Experience
Nearly all Class of 2024 seniors reported they engaged in learning activities outside the traditional course-related settings.
,Percent reporting experience "Any Type of Engaged Learning Experience",92 "Internship, Practicum, or Clinical Experience",72 Civic Engagement,38 Research Experience,36 "Client-based Project Experience",32 Creative Work,29 "International Experience",29 Entrepreneurship,20
SOURCE: Engaged Learning Census (ELC)
In 2014, the Provost’s Task Teams on Engaged Learning and Digital Instruction established goals and practices to guide U-M’s efforts to prepare students for 21st-century challenges. The five learning goals capture a range of capacities students need to address contemporary societal problems in a world that is increasingly volatile, uncertain, ambiguous, and complex: creativity; intercultural engagement; social/civic responsibility and ethical reasoning; collaboration, communication, and teamwork; and self-agency, the ability to innovate and to understand and manage risks.
When undergraduate students apply to graduate, they self-report on whether they participated in seven engaged learning experiences during their time at U-M: civic engagement, client-based projects, creative work and performance, entrepreneurship, international experience, internships, and research. The Engaged Learning Census is developed and administered in partnership by the Office of the Vice Provost for Engaged Learning, the Office of Budget and Planning, and the Office of the Registrar.
Most students report satisfaction with opportunities for research or creative activity experiences.
,Very dissatisfied,Dissatisfied,Somewhat dissatisfied,Somewhat satisfied,Satisfied,Very satisfied 2024,3,7,14,26,35,15 2022,1,4,10,24,39,22 2019,2,6,13,31,34,14 2017,2,6,13,27,34,18 2015,2,5,13,26,35,19 2014,2,5,12,27,36,18 2013,2,6,2,28,40,22 2011,1,5,11,24,39,20 2010,2,5,13,25,36,19 2009,3,6,14,23,37,17
SOURCE: U-M Asks You (UMAY) undergraduate survey
This chart shows the levels of satisfaction that seniors report through the U-M Asks You (UMAY) survey regarding the opportunities to participate in a research project or other creative activity, usually with a faculty member.
Learning Measures
Students reported gains in their academic skills and knowledge between the time they started at Michigan and their senior year.
8.8 Self-Reported Learning Gains of Graduating Seniors from Time of Initial U-M Enrollment Compared to Senior Year, 2024
,Very poor,Poor,Fair,Good,Very good,Excellent Initial Enrollment,0,3,29,44,17,6 Senior Year,0,1,2,19,54,25
,Very poor,Poor,Fair,Good,Very good,Excellent Initial Enrollment,1,5,28,37,22,8 Senior Year,0,1,5,24,44,26
,Very poor,Poor,Fair,Good,Very good,Excellent Initial Enrollment,7,23,37,23,7,3 Senior Year,0,1,3,17,45,34
,Very poor,Poor,Fair,Good,Very good,Excellent Initial Enrollment,1,7,28,35,22,7 Senior Year,0,5,17,34,31,13
SOURCE: U-M Asks You (UMAY) undergraduate survey
The blue-shaded segments represent the sum of the responses “Excellent,” “Very good,” and “Good”.
Previous Chapter
Campus Demographics
Fostering a Sense of Community & Belonging
Next Chapter
Research & Technology Transfer
Translating Discoveries into Real-World Impact